Military Branch Withdraws Controversial Manual Language Following Senate Pressure Over Hate Symbol Classifications
Aggregated, curated and edited by: LatinHub.tv
LatinHub.TV - Agentic News
The U.S. Coast Guard has eliminated problematic terminology from its workplace harassment guidelines that characterized Nazi symbols and lynching instruments as merely controversial items rather than explicit hate imagery. This reversal follows intense congressional scrutiny and threatens to delay military leadership confirmations, marking the end of weeks of internal turmoil within the maritime service.
Coast Guard Removes Controversial Language from Harassment Policy
The United States Coast Guard has officially eliminated problematic language from its workplace harassment manual following intense criticism over how it classified hate symbols. The service had faced widespread backlash for describing swastikas and nooses as merely "potentially divisive" rather than overt symbols of hatred.
According to reports, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem announced the reversal after weeks of controversy that began with Washington Post investigations. The original policy would have required commanders to consult with legal advisors before removing such symbols, treating them similarly to other divisive imagery rather than recognizing their historical significance as tools of intimidation and terror.
The controversy escalated when senators placed holds on military promotions, including that of Admiral Steven Lunday, demanding immediate policy changes. Senator Tammy Duckworth questioned why leadership wouldn't simply delete the "absurd characterization" of these universally recognized hate symbols.
This development represents a significant course correction for the Coast Guard, which had initially defended the language before ultimately acknowledging the need for clearer, more decisive policies regarding hate symbols in military workplaces.